Day 2: Pistorius’ lawyer claims Reeva wouldn’t have been able to scream after being shot

Oscar Pistorius’ defence team have claimed Reeva Steenkamp would have been unable to scream after being shot by Pistorius as she would have suffered too much brain damage.

Pistorius’ team says claims by a neighbour that she heard a woman’s screams after Reeva Steenkamp was shot will be thrown into doubt by expert evidence.

Neighbour Michelle Burger, who says she heard Ms Steenkamp being killed by Pistorius, is being grilled by the athlete’s defence team for a second day.

She told the packed courtroom in South Africa’s administrative capital Pretoria she heard a woman screaming as shots were being fired in Pistorius’ residence.

But Pistorius’ lawyer Barry Roux said: “We will debate the sequence of the bullets. We will have experts state the there was serious brain damage after the shot to the head, that it would not have been possible for her to scream at all.”

Ms Burger replied: “As I said yesterday, I heard her voice just after the last shot. It could have been that it was at the last shot was fired.”

Mr Roux opened Tuesday’s questioning by saying he wanted to focus on two aspects of Ms Burger, her “credibility and reliability”.

Mr Roux has repeatedly attempted to establish this morning that Ms Burger had already decided she did not believe Pistorius’ account of the evening – that he believed there was an intruder in his home – when she gave her evidence contradicting his story.

She is the prosecution’s key witness, as her account of hearing a woman’s screams suggests Pistorius would have known that it was his girlfriend rather than an intruder when he fired.

A tense exchange between Mr Roux and Ms Burger came to a climax when he said he’d asked her the same question eight times.

“I’m going to be really slow this time,” he said. “You heard at the bail application that it was put on behalf of Mr Pistorius that Reeva did not scream that night, is that correct?”

After giving an unclear answer, Judge Masipa insisted that she had to give a clear answer. Eventually, the witness admitted she had heard about Pistorius’ claims.

Mr Roux said: “You’ve watched Sky News, you’ve watched other channels, and you’ve got retrospective knowledge and you take that knowledge and you come and give evidence today as if it’s the knowledge of that fateful evening.”

Earlier, the trial was temporarily delayed after the witness was identified by a South African news organisation.

The trial is being televised, but witnesses can choose not to appear on camera.

Ms Burger does not want to be filmed, and the case was temporarily adjourned just before 8am after Judge Thokozile Masipa was alerted to an image of the witness that had appeared in local media.

The judge said she viewed the error as “serious” and ordered an investigation.

The double-amputee is accused of the premeditated murder of Ms Steenkamp last Valentine’s Day after a jealous row, illegal possession of ammunition and two additional counts relating to shooting a gun in public in two separate incidents before the killing.

The 27-year-old, who is known as the Blade Runner, denies all the charges against him. He claims he shot his girlfriend by mistake at his home after mistaking her for an intruder.

The trial, large parts of which can be broadcast live after a landmark ruling, is scheduled to last for three weeks and will hear from more than 100 witnesses.

South Africa does not have a jury system. Instead, Judge Masipa will decide his fate.

If Pistorius is found guilty he could be jailed for at least 25 years.